We are inter-Dimensional Beings.
Any thinker recognizes the unbridgeable LAND difficulty unformed minds project onto abstract concepts that reflect the full richness of the different ideological schools of thought.
Our goal of exposing such conceptions sterilized condensed in a few paragraphs from the outset any possibility of harmonizing criteria, giving them the proper way that we accept. But at least I will sketch a picture with rapid strokes of the structure of our thought.
Advances in the field of cosmology, have shed enough light to speculation of our ideologues leave the shifting terrain of intuitions, and to rely on a refined empiricism, embracing that allowed us to formulate hypotheses much more consistent than those of yesteryear.
We can reveal that the first "shock" suffered by the preterit mechanistic conceptions of the Cosmos, was caused when our cosmophysics amounted to verify the genuine nature of physical space.
Our model of Cosmos is able to explain satisfactorily all the questions that arise not only in physics but in the biological and psycho-physical field. It is compatible with the rich phenomenology of observers we are optional.
There is however a perfect model-final and real, simply because, although formulations up to our own what is being?, What is not? .. What is ψ be? Why are we here ... what is the''entity "necessary? (Mind you I try to reflect the more familiar formulations of you) and therefore to satisfy our subjective aspirations of harmonious knowledge sophistically introduce some false convictions.
The model that there is a goal to us. The that to meet our own mental models, typical of people with a defined structure Neurocortical, we can call the Out--MY-MIND as a concept "apprehended" in all its entirety, regardless of another thinking entity DIFFERENT-A-ME -structure may also satisfy their formulations, leading to results that repugnant to my I-STRUCTURAL but would be perfectly valid for him.
But this is a corollary to the disturbing question presented in the first place. Is there an objective standard of "Cosmos"?, Because if not, the confusion introduced impossible any hope of certainty.